|
Rules
Mar 31, 2006 20:52:42 GMT -5
Post by Flamethrower-chan on Mar 31, 2006 20:52:42 GMT -5
The rules are simple. If any member(s) are to get into a heated argument with any other member the following will happen: - FIRST TIME: Member will be warned.
- SECOND TIME: Member will be given one last chance.
- THIRD TIME: Members account will be deleted. NO EXCEPTIONS!!!
(Rules may change over time.)
|
|
|
Rules
Feb 26, 2007 23:06:04 GMT -5
Post by Flamethrower-chan on Feb 26, 2007 23:06:04 GMT -5
ummm...you're welcome *hit str8girl666 on the head* stop stairing at it.
|
|
|
Rules
Feb 27, 2007 10:44:20 GMT -5
Post by Daemonic on Feb 27, 2007 10:44:20 GMT -5
It would be appreciated for some rules. For example, what if there were a heated argument between forum members? To the point where they began to insult each other and the way they think. There has to be some type of order in case things like that do happen. First: A warning. Next: a second warning and threaten to ban or delete account if things continue. Then on the third offense: poof! Account is gone. This is, however, my personal opinion. Do what you like.
|
|
|
Rules
Feb 27, 2007 10:52:14 GMT -5
Post by Flamethrower-chan on Feb 27, 2007 10:52:14 GMT -5
Actually that would be a good idea considering the fact that all the members aren't always going to get along *slaps self on head*-_-' I should of thought that.
|
|
|
Rules
Feb 27, 2007 10:54:08 GMT -5
Post by Daemonic on Feb 27, 2007 10:54:08 GMT -5
I'm just pointing out loopholes. Perhaps there should be a list or something. ...or just dont make a list and ban random people for the fun of it. j/k
|
|
|
Rules
Feb 27, 2007 10:57:45 GMT -5
Post by Flamethrower-chan on Feb 27, 2007 10:57:45 GMT -5
I wasn't planning on doing that.-_-' -lol- But I'm glad that you pointed this outin fact I was planning on making a board for members to tell suggestions to make this site better.
|
|
|
Rules
Feb 27, 2007 10:59:16 GMT -5
Post by Daemonic on Feb 27, 2007 10:59:16 GMT -5
I know you're trying to make this site as free of rules as possible. The closest thing to that would be a type of forum "despotism" (That means that there is a type of "government" but it's not exactly the dominant thing, ya know?) The rule I stated before is all I really can think of.
|
|
|
Rules
Feb 27, 2007 19:38:21 GMT -5
Post by fallenangel91 on Feb 27, 2007 19:38:21 GMT -5
I personally think that the members should be allowed to fight it out, but if the argument gets too intense the administrator should step in and give one warning. If the problem persists then they should be banned.
|
|
|
Rules
Feb 28, 2007 8:50:55 GMT -5
Post by Daemonic on Feb 28, 2007 8:50:55 GMT -5
Thats what I was speaking of Itachi-san. Perhaps the one warning thing is the best course of action, but that's for the admin. to decide.
|
|
|
Rules
Feb 28, 2007 23:22:30 GMT -5
Post by theartofbreaking on Feb 28, 2007 23:22:30 GMT -5
ive been on forums and alliances for years and ive noticed thats normally the best thing to do. i mean, come on. who fights over internet anyway. its not like you can be a hardcore gangsta nigga killin' mofo on a forum. so let the people just fight it out.
|
|
|
Rules
Mar 1, 2007 12:01:28 GMT -5
Post by Daemonic on Mar 1, 2007 12:01:28 GMT -5
Trifle arguments that don't spread too badly aren't usually going to catch our eye, mostly because it's not going to go to the point where they are extremely offensive and flat out rude. Once it reaches that point, they are warned. If it happens again, that is the last chance. Small arguments are allowed. Yet when it goes to the point where it's offending either more than one person, or if it goes to where it's off topic and they're threatening to kill each other, that's just too far. We have to realistic and set some boundries in terms of arguments. This is a place for people to state their opinions, not insult other people's opinions.
|
|
|
Rules
Mar 3, 2007 15:21:41 GMT -5
Post by SchizophrenicFox on Mar 3, 2007 15:21:41 GMT -5
"I personally think that the members should be allowed to fight it out, but if the argument gets too intense the administrator should step in and give one warning. If the problem persists then they should be banned." -x- *puts kunais away* Awwwww....lol
|
|
zirall
Academy Student
Posts: 31
|
Rules
Mar 5, 2007 8:28:15 GMT -5
Post by zirall on Mar 5, 2007 8:28:15 GMT -5
Eeeeh Fights can't get tooo intense on a forum... And if people are Mature and smart enough then there shouldn't be ANYONE getting a Warning.
|
|
|
Rules
Mar 5, 2007 23:18:37 GMT -5
Post by Flamethrower-chan on Mar 5, 2007 23:18:37 GMT -5
Yeah I know, but these are just temporary until I can come up with some really good rules.
|
|
|
Rules
Mar 7, 2007 11:45:28 GMT -5
Post by Daemonic on Mar 7, 2007 11:45:28 GMT -5
Eeeeh Fights can't get tooo intense on a forum... And if people are Mature and smart enough then there shouldn't be ANYONE getting a Warning. I agree
|
|
str8girl666
Genin
And if you aint down with that, I got 2 ... words....for ya
Posts: 96
|
Rules
Mar 19, 2007 20:54:50 GMT -5
Post by str8girl666 on Mar 19, 2007 20:54:50 GMT -5
I don't get why we can't just let them fight, do yo really care if 2 assholes fight via text? Whats the worst that can happen, ooo wow someone gets hit with the words *hits you* ow that hurts, fuck the rulez nelly let'em fight
|
|
|
Rules
Mar 20, 2007 10:01:23 GMT -5
Post by SchizophrenicFox on Mar 20, 2007 10:01:23 GMT -5
Go Neisha!! =D *gets out kunais*
|
|
str8girl666
Genin
And if you aint down with that, I got 2 ... words....for ya
Posts: 96
|
Rules
Mar 20, 2007 15:06:38 GMT -5
Post by str8girl666 on Mar 20, 2007 15:06:38 GMT -5
omg tater please don't kill anyone with crappy coordination
|
|
|
Rules
Mar 21, 2007 9:11:23 GMT -5
Post by SchizophrenicFox on Mar 21, 2007 9:11:23 GMT -5
omg tater please don't give anyone with crappy corrdination -x- omg Neisha please don't give anyone with crappy spelling.
|
|
str8girl666
Genin
And if you aint down with that, I got 2 ... words....for ya
Posts: 96
|
Rules
Mar 21, 2007 11:23:45 GMT -5
Post by str8girl666 on Mar 21, 2007 11:23:45 GMT -5
you win this round ms. tot
|
|
|
Rules
Mar 26, 2007 15:32:18 GMT -5
Post by SchizophrenicFox on Mar 26, 2007 15:32:18 GMT -5
you win this round ms. tot -x- That's Mrs. Nunnally, to you, Mrs. Rollins. ^^
|
|
str8girl666
Genin
And if you aint down with that, I got 2 ... words....for ya
Posts: 96
|
Rules
Mar 27, 2007 17:34:02 GMT -5
Post by str8girl666 on Mar 27, 2007 17:34:02 GMT -5
Rollins sounds way better than Nunnally
|
|
|
Rules
Mar 28, 2007 9:57:06 GMT -5
Post by Daemonic on Mar 28, 2007 9:57:06 GMT -5
Gardner sounds better than both.
|
|
|
Rules
Mar 28, 2007 16:40:12 GMT -5
Post by SchizophrenicFox on Mar 28, 2007 16:40:12 GMT -5
Gardner sounds better than both. -x- ...Uh....no. Rollins sounds like those candies, Rolo. But I like Rolo, so it doesn't matter.
|
|
|
Rules
Mar 28, 2007 20:48:46 GMT -5
Post by Flamethrower-chan on Mar 28, 2007 20:48:46 GMT -5
Well Valdes is Cuban so it sounds better then all of them. lol
|
|
str8girl666
Genin
And if you aint down with that, I got 2 ... words....for ya
Posts: 96
|
Rules
Apr 17, 2007 8:39:18 GMT -5
Post by str8girl666 on Apr 17, 2007 8:39:18 GMT -5
Crap sadly i have to agree with Nelly, Tony Montana(Scarface) is Cuban, crap damn you Nelly with your cool last name
|
|
|
Rules
Apr 17, 2007 9:03:20 GMT -5
Post by Daemonic on Apr 17, 2007 9:03:20 GMT -5
Gardner is still better.
|
|
str8girl666
Genin
And if you aint down with that, I got 2 ... words....for ya
Posts: 96
|
Rules
Apr 17, 2007 9:14:36 GMT -5
Post by str8girl666 on Apr 17, 2007 9:14:36 GMT -5
No its not, it sounds a Mexican's ocupation
|
|
|
Rules
Apr 17, 2007 9:15:31 GMT -5
Post by fallenangel91 on Apr 17, 2007 9:15:31 GMT -5
she's got you there kenny
|
|
|
Rules
Apr 17, 2007 9:20:10 GMT -5
Post by Daemonic on Apr 17, 2007 9:20:10 GMT -5
You're only agreeing with her because she's your significant other.
|
|